Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 05:15
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
This nonhormonal hot-flash remedy gives options to women, experts say - The Washington Post
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Where and how did ballet originate?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
How can I get my ex-husband to love me again?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Gut microbiome study links Parkinson's disease to environmental chemicals - Medical Xpress
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
How do I become an intelligent man?
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Lipari Foods Issues Allergy Alert on Undeclared Milk in "Dark Chocolate Nonpareils" - fda.gov
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.